Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KNG vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against KNG’s 8.5%, though KNG returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

8.5%KNG cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+8.3%KNG total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KNG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

KNG 53.8MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

KNG1.6 pts behind NOBL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
NOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%8.5% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind NOBLTotal return, distributions reinvestedNOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%8.5% as cash1.6 pts behind NOBL
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%26.5% as cash9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KNG and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in KNGOnly in MAGY
Johnson & Johnson 1.85%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Nucor Corporation 1.85%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.77%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Chubb Limited 1.74%
Becton, Dickinson and Company 1.72%
The Procter & Gamble Company 1.72%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 1.71%
Walmart Inc. 1.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KNG and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
KNGMAGYKNGMAGYKNGMAGY
3 months+1.8%+3.7%2.2%6.1%−0.1 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+7.1%+8.1%4.4%12.9%−0.9 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+8.3%+1.8%8.5%26.5%−1.6 pts−9.4 pts
3 years+24.0%not published25.4%not published−4.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+101.5%+25.6%59.4%42.0%−15.2 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KNG and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategydividend stocks with call overlaycovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL)Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized8.8%19.2%
Expense ratio0.74%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year8.5%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−0.4%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+8.3%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+9.9%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age3097 days513 days
Net assets$3.3bn$102m

KNG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.3%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +9.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KNG or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KNG or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, KNG returned +8.3% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so KNG returned more.
Which is cheaper, KNG or MAGY?
KNG charges 0.74% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so KNG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KNG against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KNG against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kng-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources