Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its price in cash against MAGY’s 24.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and YMAG
Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $268m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
33.4% of it arrived as cash
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
33.4% as cash
33.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MAGY costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; YMAG is 2.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | YMAG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | +5.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 26.1% | fell 29.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 11% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | its own holdings |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 1.34% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $92m | $268m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
May 2, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 78 weekly returnsFrom May 2025 to Oct 2026, YMAG returned more: +34.7% to +17.1%. MAGY swung less: 15.0% to 17.2%. YMAG fell slightly less at its worst: −13.1% to −13.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MAGY | YMAG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +17.1% | +34.7% | YMAG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +11.1% | +22.0% | YMAG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −25.8% | −30.4% | MAGY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.0% | 17.2% | MAGY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.4% | 10.9% | YMAG (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −13.4% | −13.1% | YMAG (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 1.01 | YMAG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.68 | 1.59 | YMAG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.83 | 1.68 | YMAG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 78 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | YMAG | MAGY | YMAG | MAGY | YMAG |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +3.3% | 5.4% | 9.1% | +1.2 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +0.8% | +1.9% | 11.3% | 18.1% | −1.8 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | −1.5% | +5.8% | 24.0% | 33.4% | −7.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · YMAG Jan 2024 | +25.7% | +70.3% | 44.0% | 91.7% | −37.0 pts | not measured |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
YMAG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. YMAG's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Nov 2, 2026) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 11% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against YMAG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-ymag
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against YMAG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-ymag
[MAGY against YMAG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-ymag)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.