Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

KYLD vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KYLD paid 25.2% of its price in cash against MAGY’s 24.0%, though MAGY returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KYLD and MAGY

Net assets: $47m on Nov 3, 2026 for Kurv High Income ETF, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
25.2%
KYLD cash paid, 1 year
24.0%
MAGY cash paid, 1 year
−5.0%
KYLD total return, 1 year
−1.5%
MAGY total return, 1 year
KYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
KYLD
−5.0%
none

Not measured

KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KYLD

−5.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KYLD

−5.0%

25.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY
−1.5%
MAGS
+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

MAGY costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; MAGY is 2.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

KYLD vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureKYLDMAGY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year−5.0%−1.5%
Price changefell 21.4% (6 months)fell 26.1% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarkits own holdingsMagnificent Seven, measured through MAGS
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 7.7 ptsbehind by 7.8 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.08%0.99%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$47m$92m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KYLD and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KYLD MAGY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KYLD
Global X Silver Miners ETF 7.60%
VanEck Gold Miners ETF 7.20%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.81%
Howmet Aerospace Inc 5.81%
Teradyne Inc 5.53%
Shopify Inc 4.37%
Robinhood Markets Inc 4.35%
BWX Technologies Inc 4.29%
Only in MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%
MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KYLD Kurv High Income ETF · Option income on its own holdings, paying weekly MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark KYLD's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Aug 31, 2026) Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Pays weekly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 30.4% 25.1%
Expense ratio 1.08% 0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year 25.2% 24.0%
Price change, 1 year −28.6% −26.1%
Total return, 1 year −5.0% −1.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +6.3%
Ahead or behind not available −7.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 1.0 years 1.5 years
Net assets, KYLD as of Nov 3, 2026 and MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 $47m $94m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: KYLD vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowKYLDMAGYKYLDMAGYKYLDMAGY
3 months−13.3%+4.0%6.2%5.4%+4.1 pts+1.2 pts
6 months−10.9%+0.8%11.9%11.3%+7.6 pts−1.8 pts
1 year−5.0%−1.5%25.2%24.0%not measured−7.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: KYLD Oct 2025 · MAGY Apr 2025−10.9%+25.7%23.6%44.0%not measured−37.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

MAGY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KYLD

No 1-year comparison: it had filed no holdings by Nov 4, 2025, the year's first day. KYLD's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Aug 31, 2026) returned −18.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.7 pts.

Over the 6 months to Nov 4, 2026, KYLD paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.4%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KYLD or MAGY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KYLD paid 25.2% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so KYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KYLD or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, KYLD returned −5.0% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, KYLD or MAGY?
KYLD charges 1.08% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KYLD against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-magy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.