Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs ODTE: which paid, and which earned it?

MAGY and ODTE both write options for income.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
6.7%ODTE cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+6.2%ODTE total return, 1 year
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
ODTE10.5 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%6.7% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%10.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and ODTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in ODTE
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 33.70%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 33.27%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF 33.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and ODTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYODTEMAGYODTEMAGYODTE
3 months+3.7%−4.8%6.1%3.4%−3.9 pts−7.0 pts
6 months+8.1%not published12.9%not published−12.7 ptsnot published
1 year+1.8%not published26.5%not published−9.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+25.6%+6.2%42.0%6.7%−37.5 pts−10.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and ODTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
ODTE
VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillVegaShares
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%14.1%
Expense ratio0.99%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%6.7% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+6.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+16.7%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−10.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days169 days
Net assets$102m$3m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

ODTE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ODTE paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MAGY or ODTE?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and ODTE charges 0.68%, so ODTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against ODTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against ODTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-odte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources