Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs RDVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against RDVI’s 8.8%, though RDVI returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
8.8%RDVI cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+19.2%RDVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RDVI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6RDVI 62.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
RDVI8 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8.8% of it arrived as cash8 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and RDVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in RDVI
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%Lam Research Corporation 2.31%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.30%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.27%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.22%
GE Vernova Inc. 2.19%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.18%
KLA Corporation 2.16%
NVIDIA Corporation 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and RDVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYRDVIMAGYRDVIMAGYRDVI
3 months+3.7%+0.3%6.1%2.1%−3.9 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+8.1%+15.1%12.9%4.6%−12.7 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+1.8%+19.2%26.5%8.8%−9.4 pts−8.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+69.2%not published29.6%not published+15.5 pts
Since launch+25.6%+101.2%42.0%41.0%−37.5 pts+32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and RDVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillFirst Trust
Strategycovered calldividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%8.8%
Expense ratio0.99%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%8.8%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%+9.6%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+19.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+27.2%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−8.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days1429 days
Net assets$102m$3.7bn

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

RDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDVI paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or RDVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 8.8%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or RDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and RDVI returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or RDVI?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so RDVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against RDVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against RDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-rdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources