Data as of .
IQQQ vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against IQQQ’s 6.5%, though IQQQ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IQQQ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IQQQ and OMAH hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IQQQ | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. | 6.74% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.25% | 4.57% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.01% | 4.54% |
| Kraft Heinz Co. (The) | 0.12% | 4.46% |
| Only in IQQQ | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 7.60% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| NVIDIA Corp. 7.54% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Microsoft Corp. 4.92% | Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 4.44% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.27% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.41% | Chevron Corp 4.75% |
| Tesla, Inc. 3.20% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Broadcom, Inc. 3.11% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQQQ | OMAH | IQQQ | OMAH | IQQQ | OMAH | |
| 3 months | −3.1% | +1.7% | 1.8% | 3.7% | −0.6 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +19.1% | +8.8% | 4.2% | 7.7% | −5.1 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +17.7% | +8.8% | 6.5% | 14.4% | −4.1 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +51.5% | +14.6% | 24.4% | 21.4% | −13.0 pts | +12.4 pts |
| IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 5.7% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.97% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.5% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +10.8% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.7% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.1 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 912 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $405m | $1.1bn |
IQQQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IQQQ paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, IQQQ or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IQQQ paid 6.5% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, IQQQ or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, IQQQ returned +17.7% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IQQQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, IQQQ or OMAH?
- IQQQ charges 0.97% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so IQQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IQQQ against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iqqq-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.