Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
INK vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
INK costs 0.63 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | INK | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +10.9% |
| Price change | fell 1.2% (since Nov 4, 2026) | fell 4.6% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, INK as of Nov 11, 2026 and OMAH as of Nov 10, 2026 | $5.3m | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.1.1 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
OMAH
+10.9%
14.4% of it arrived as cash
1.1 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.1 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
OMAH
+10.9%
14.4% as cash
1.1 pts behind SPY
14.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | INK | OMAH | INK | OMAH | INK | OMAH |
| 3 months | – | +2.8% | – | 3.7% | – | +5.2 pts |
| 6 months | – | +5.3% | – | 7.4% | – | +3.6 pts |
| 1 year | – | +10.9% | – | 14.4% | – | −1.1 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: INK Nov 2026 · OMAH Mar 2025 | −1.2% | +18.6% | 0.0% | 23.7% | not measured | −13.8 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
INK
Over the period from its first trade on Nov 4, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, INK paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.2%.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, INK against OMAH, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-omah
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). INK against OMAH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-omah
[INK against OMAH (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-omah)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
INK and OMAH both write options for income.