Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
INK vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
INK costs 0.64 points a year less; MAGY is 17.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | INK | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −2.4% |
| Price change | fell 1.2% (since Nov 4, 2026) | fell 26.6% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 9, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $5.3m | $91m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.7.5 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.6%, total −2.4%, MAGS +5.1%, −7.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MAGS
+5.1%
MAGY
−2.4%
7.5 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.5 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.6%, total −2.4%, MAGS +5.1%, −7.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MAGS
+5.1%
MAGY
−2.4%
7.5 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.6%, total −2.4%, MAGS +5.1%, −7.5 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | INK | MAGY | INK | MAGY | INK | MAGY |
| 3 months | – | +2.5% | – | 5.4% | – | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | −3.2% | – | 11.0% | – | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | – | −2.4% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: INK Nov 2026 · MAGY Apr 2025 | −1.2% | +23.7% | 0.0% | 44.4% | not measured | −35.7 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
INK
Over the period from its first trade on Nov 4, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, INK paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.2%.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.4%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +5.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.7%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, INK against MAGY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-magy
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). INK against MAGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-magy
[INK against MAGY (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-magy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
INK and MAGY both write options for income.