Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IAUI vs SLJY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SLJY paid 25.9% of its price in cash against IAUI’s 14.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NEOS Gold High Income ETF and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF.

14.1%IAUI cash paid, 1 year
25.9%SLJY cash paid, 1 year
+11.9%IAUI total return, 1 year
+40.0%SLJY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SLJY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IAUI 42.1SLJY 53.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IAUI7.7 pts behind GLD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+19.5%IAUI+11.9%14.1% as cash7.7 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+19.5%IAUI+11.9%7.7 pts behind GLD
SLJY13.2 pts behind SILJ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%25.9% of it arrived as cash13.2 pts behind SILJTotal return, distributions reinvestedSILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%13.2 pts behind SILJ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IAUI and SLJY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IAUIOnly in SLJY
United States Treasury Bill 77.67%Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF 24.33%
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ET 21.89%Hecla Mining Co 6.90%
United States Treasury Bill 0.43%First Majestic Silver Corp 6.43%
COEUR MINING INC. 6.01%
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 5.30%
Skeena Resources Ltd 4.48%
Endeavour Silver Corp 4.40%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 4.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IAUI and SLJY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IAUISLJYIAUISLJYIAUISLJY
3 months+2.6%+9.2%3.0%5.8%−1.0 pts+1.1 pts
6 months−1.4%+15.2%5.8%12.3%+1.6 pts+0.4 pts
1 year+11.9%+40.0%14.1%25.9%−7.7 pts−13.2 pts
Since launch+19.7%+57.3%17.7%29.1%−10.0 pts−32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IAUI and SLJY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
Option income on GLD, paying monthly
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SILJ, paying monthly
IssuerNEOSAmplify
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Junior silver miners (SILJ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.9%23.4%
Expense ratio0.79%not published
Cash paid, 1 year14.1%25.9%
Price change, 1 year−2.0%+12.3%
Total return, 1 year+11.9%+40.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+19.5%+53.2%
Ahead or behind−7.7 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate84%not published
Age470 days395 days
Net assets$635m$78m

IAUI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IAUI paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Gold (GLD) returned +19.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SLJY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SLJY paid 25.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +40.0%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +53.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IAUI or SLJY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IAUI paid 14.1% of its starting price in cash and SLJY paid 25.9%, so SLJY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IAUI or SLJY?
With every distribution reinvested, IAUI returned +11.9% and SLJY returned +40.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SLJY returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IAUI against SLJY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IAUI against SLJY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iaui-vs-sljy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources