Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SLJY vs SLVY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
SLJY and SLVY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SLJY and SLVYNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $63m for Amplify SILJ Junior Silver Miners Covered Call ETF and $838,838 for FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF.
1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% of it arrived as cash
1 pt behind SILJ
Total return, distributions reinvested
1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% cash
1 pt behind SILJ
27.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.0.7 pts ahead of SLV
SLVY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −14.3%, total −12.2%, SLV −12.9%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SLV
−12.9%
SLVY
−12.2%
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
SLVY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −14.3%, total −12.2%, SLV −12.9%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SLV
−12.9%
SLVY
−12.2%
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
2.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SLVY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −14.3%, total −12.2%, SLV −12.9%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SLJY costs 0.09 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SLJY | SLVY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.6% | not published |
| Price change | fell 5.4% (1 year) | fell 14.3% (since Jul 9, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Junior silver miners, measured through SILJ | Silver, measured through SLV |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 1.0 pts | ahead by 0.7 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.76% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $63m | $838,838 |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SLJY and SLVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SLJY | SLVY | SLJY | SLVY | SLJY | SLVY |
| 3 months | −10.0% | −15.3% | 5.6% | 1.7% | +2.0 pts | +0.6 pts |
| 6 months | −17.2% | – | 10.2% | – | +4.2 pts | – |
| 1 year | +18.6% | – | 27.5% | – | −1.0 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: SLJY Aug 2025 · SLVY Jul 2026 | +30.8% | −12.2% | 33.2% | 2.3% | −22.3 pts | +0.7 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
SLJY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SLJY paid 27.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +19.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 22.6%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
SLVY
Over the period from its first trade on Jul 9, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, SLVY paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −12.2%. Silver (SLV) returned −12.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SLJY against SLVY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sljy-vs-slvy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SLJY against SLVY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sljy-vs-slvy
[SLJY against SLVY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sljy-vs-slvy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.