Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
IGLD vs SLJY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SLJY paid 27.5% of its price in cash against IGLD’s 20.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGLD and SLJY
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $555m for FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF and $63m for Amplify SILJ Junior Silver Miners Covered Call ETF.
2.9 pts behind GLD
IGLD over 1 year: paid 20.6%, price −18.8%, total −0.1%, GLD +2.8%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GLD
+2.8%
IGLD
−0.1%
2.9 pts behind GLD
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.9 pts behind GLD
IGLD over 1 year: paid 20.6%, price −18.8%, total −0.1%, GLD +2.8%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GLD
+2.8%
IGLD
−0.1%
2.9 pts behind GLD
20.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IGLD over 1 year: paid 20.6%, price −18.8%, total −0.1%, GLD +2.8%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% of it arrived as cash
1 pt behind SILJ
Total return, distributions reinvested
1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% as cash
1 pt behind SILJ
27.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SLJY costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.7 points; IGLD is 8.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | IGLD | SLJY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +18.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 18.8% | fell 5.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 68% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Gold, measured through GLD | Junior silver miners, measured through SILJ |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 2.9 pts | behind by 1.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.76% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $555m | $63m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Aug 29, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 61 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: IGLD against GLD, Mar 12, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026; SLJY against SILJ, Aug 29, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Aug 2025 to Oct 2026, SLJY returned more: +10.0% to +5.9%. IGLD swung less: 20.1% to 47.3%. IGLD fell less at its worst: −25.1% to −37.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IGLD | SLJY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5.9% | +10.0% | SLJY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +5.0% | +8.5% | SLJY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −14.9% | −15.1% | Tie | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.1% | 47.3% | IGLD | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.7% | 32.9% | IGLD | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −25.1% | −37.9% | IGLD | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 70.5% | 45.7% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 88.0% | 97.1% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.81 | 0.80 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.95 | 0.97 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.16 | 0.33 | SLJY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.21 | 0.47 | SLJY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.088 | 0.193 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.20 | 0.22 | SLJY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | GLD | SILJ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −2.5% a year | −10.6% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.87 | −1.33 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −5.1% to +0.1% | −26.7% to +5.4% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −1.07 | −1.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 4.4% | 14.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 61 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGLD and SLJY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IGLD | SLJY | IGLD | SLJY | IGLD | SLJY |
| 3 months | −5.3% | −10.0% | 3.0% | 5.6% | −0.9 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | −13.8% | −17.2% | 7.8% | 10.2% | −0.2 pts | +4.2 pts |
| 1 year | −0.1% | +18.6% | 20.6% | 27.5% | −2.9 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 3 years | +67.5% | – | 55.7% | – | −34.0 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: IGLD Mar 2021 · SLJY Aug 2025 | +80.2% | +30.8% | 65.7% | 33.2% | −51.7 pts | −22.3 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IGLD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IGLD paid 20.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.1%. Gold (GLD) returned +2.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 68% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
SLJY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SLJY paid 27.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +19.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 22.6%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGLD against SLJY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/igld-vs-sljy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). IGLD against SLJY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/igld-vs-sljy
[IGLD against SLJY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/igld-vs-sljy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.