Data as of .
KGLD vs SLJY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year SLJY paid 25.9% of its price in cash against KGLD’s 16.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KGLD scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KGLD and SLJY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KGLD | Only in SLJY |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 41.06% | Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF 24.33% |
| TREASURY BILL 40.22% | Hecla Mining Co 6.90% |
| TREASURY BILL 18.71% | First Majestic Silver Corp 6.43% |
| COEUR MINING INC. 6.01% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 5.30% | |
| Skeena Resources Ltd 4.48% | |
| Endeavour Silver Corp 4.40% | |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 4.10% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGLD | SLJY | KGLD | SLJY | KGLD | SLJY | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +9.2% | 3.8% | 5.8% | −0.8 pts | +1.1 pts |
| 6 months | −4.7% | +15.2% | 7.4% | 12.3% | −1.8 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 1 year | +18.9% | +40.0% | 16.0% | 25.9% | −0.6 pts | −13.2 pts |
| Since launch | +29.8% | +57.3% | 19.2% | 29.1% | −2.0 pts | −32.0 pts |
| KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on GLD, paying monthly | SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF Covered call on SILJ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Kurv | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Gold (GLD) | Junior silver miners (SILJ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.3% | 23.4% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 16.0% | 25.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.4% | +12.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.9% | +40.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +19.5% | +53.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.6 pts | −13.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 86% | not published |
| Age | 437 days | 395 days |
| Net assets | $163m | $78m |
KGLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KGLD paid 16.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Gold (GLD) returned +19.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 86% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
SLJY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SLJY paid 25.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +40.0%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +53.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, KGLD or SLJY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KGLD paid 16.0% of its starting price in cash and SLJY paid 25.9%, so SLJY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, KGLD or SLJY?
- With every distribution reinvested, KGLD returned +18.9% and SLJY returned +40.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SLJY returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KGLD against SLJY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kgld-vs-sljy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.