Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FTQI vs KNG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against KNG’s 8.8%, though KNG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTQI and KNG

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $997m for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF and $3.4bn for FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF.

At a glance
12.1%
FTQI cash paid, 1 year
8.8%
KNG cash paid, 1 year
+16.5%
FTQI total return, 1 year
+20.8%
KNG total return, 1 year
FTQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
FTQI
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
KNG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.1 pts behind NOBL
KNG
+20.8%
NOBL
+23.9%

3.1 pts behind NOBL

KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

NOBL

+23.9%

KNG

+20.8%

8.8% of it arrived as cash

3.1 pts behind NOBL

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.1 pts behind NOBL

KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

NOBL

+23.9%

KNG

+20.8%

3.1 pts behind NOBL

8.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +23.9%. KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +23.9%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

KNG costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; KNG is 3.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FTQI vs KNG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTQIKNG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+20.8%
Price change, 1 yearrose 3.5%rose 11.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate99% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment80% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats, measured through NOBL
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$997m$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common4%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · KNG scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score74FTQI91.3KNG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Apr 6, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026 · 447 weekly returns
FTQI KNG
Return
Total return edge KNG +93.8% +113.7%
Annualized edge KNG +8.0% +9.2%
Price return edge KNG +0.2% +29.8%
Risk
Volatility edge FTQI 12.0% 16.6%
Max drawdown edge FTQI −18.5% −30.1%
Downside capture 58.3% 96.9%
Beta 0.45 0.96
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTQI (slight) 0.47 0.45
Sortino edge FTQI (slight) 0.65 0.63
Treynor 0.123 0.078
Calmar edge FTQI 0.43 0.31
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.0% a year −0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.90 −0.81
Information ratio −0.84 −0.42
Tracking error 13.4% 2.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FTQI against QQQ, Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026; KNG against NOBL, Apr 6, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Apr 2018 to Oct 2026, KNG returned more: +113.7% to +93.8%. FTQI swung less: 12.0% to 16.6%. FTQI fell less at its worst: −18.5% to −30.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTQI vs KNG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTQIKNGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+93.8%+113.7%KNGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.0%+9.2%KNGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+0.2%+29.8%KNGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.0%16.6%FTQISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.6%11.8%FTQILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.5%−30.1%FTQIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture31.2%91.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture58.3%96.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.450.96Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.550.98Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.470.45FTQI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.650.63FTQI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1230.078Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.430.31FTQIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQNOBLThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.0% a year−0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.90−0.81Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.4% to +2.4%−2.1% to +0.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.84−0.42Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.4%2.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 447 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, FTQI and KNG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTQI KNG
AbbVie Inc. 1.48% 1.44%
Caterpillar Inc. 0.66% 1.21%
Nordson Corporation 0.37% 1.43%
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 0.24% 1.48%
The Coca-Cola Company 0.24% 1.46%
Johnson & Johnson 0.20% 1.48%
Cincinnati Financial Corporation 0.17% 1.52%
Chevron Corporation 0.14% 1.42%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 0.14% 1.43%
Consolidated Edison, Inc. 0.11% 1.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTQI
Apple Inc. 8.98%
NVIDIA Corporation 6.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.73%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.23%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.10%
Tesla, Inc. 3.05%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.60%
Only in KNG
Pentair plc 1.89%
Roper Technologies, Inc. 1.70%
Erie Indemnity Company 1.58%
The Clorox Company 1.58%
PPG Industries, Inc. 1.57%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 1.57%
Abbott Laboratories 1.56%
General Dynamics Corporation 1.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly
Strategy covered call dividend stocks with call overlay
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 12.3% 8.0%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.74%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.1% 8.8%
Price change, 1 year +3.5% +11.1%
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +20.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +23.9%
Ahead or behind +4.2 pts −3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 99% 80%
Age 12.8 years 8.6 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $997m $3.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FTQI vs KNG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFTQIKNGFTQIKNGFTQIKNG
3 months+0.4%+5.2%3.0%2.0%+3.8 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+6.6%+13.5%6.0%4.3%+6.9 pts−1.4 pts
1 year+16.5%+20.8%12.1%8.8%+4.3 pts−3.1 pts
3 years+60.8%+41.8%38.1%26.9%−30.5 pts−6.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FTQI Jan 2014 · KNG Mar 2018+138.8%+120.8%81.1%61.2%−641.3 pts−19.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FTQI and KNG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

KNG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KNG paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.8%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +23.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FTQI or KNG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its starting price in cash and KNG paid 8.8%, so FTQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTQI or KNG?
With every distribution reinvested, FTQI returned +16.5% and KNG +20.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FTQI or KNG?
FTQI charges 0.75% a year and KNG charges 0.74%, so KNG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTQI against KNG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftqi-vs-kng

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.