Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

KNG vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its price in cash against KNG’s 8.8%, though KNG returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KNG and QYLD

Net assets: $3.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF, and $8.5bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
8.8%
KNG cash paid, 1 year
12.3%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
+20.8%
KNG total return, 1 year
+16.5%
QYLD total return, 1 year
KNG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.1 pts behind NOBL
KNG
+20.8%
NOBL
+23.9%

3.1 pts behind NOBL

KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

NOBL

+23.9%

KNG

+20.8%

8.8% of it arrived as cash

3.1 pts behind NOBL

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.1 pts behind NOBL

KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

NOBL

+23.9%

KNG

+20.8%

3.1 pts behind NOBL

8.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. KNG over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +11.1%, total +20.8%, NOBL +23.9%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +23.9%. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +23.9%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QYLD costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; QYLD is 2.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

KNG vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureKNGQYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+16.5%
Price change, 1 yearrose 11.1%rose 3.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate80% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats, measured through NOBLNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.74%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$3.3bn$8.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common5%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · KNG scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score91.3KNG72.8QYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Apr 6, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026 · 447 weekly returns
KNG QYLD
Return
Total return edge KNG (slight) +113.7% +111.4%
Annualized edge Tie +9.2% +9.1%
Price return edge KNG +29.8% −23.2%
Risk
Volatility edge QYLD 16.6% 13.4%
Max drawdown edge QYLD −30.1% −24.5%
Downside capture 96.9% 64.8%
Beta 0.96 0.55
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QYLD 0.45 0.51
Sortino edge QYLD (slight) 0.63 0.68
Treynor 0.078 0.127
Calmar edge QYLD 0.31 0.37
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.6% a year −2.3% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.81 −1.37
Information ratio −0.42 −0.93
Tracking error 2.4% 10.6%

Each against its own benchmark: KNG against NOBL, Apr 6, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026; QYLD against QQQ, Dec 20, 2013 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Apr 2018 to Oct 2026, KNG returned slightly more: +113.7% to +111.4%. QYLD swung less: 13.4% to 16.6%. QYLD fell less at its worst: −24.5% to −30.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: KNG vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureKNGQYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+113.7%+111.4%KNG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+9.1%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+29.8%−23.2%KNGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.6%13.4%QYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.8%10.1%QYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.1%−24.5%QYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture91.7%37.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture96.9%64.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.960.55Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.980.77Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.450.51QYLDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.630.68QYLD (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0780.127Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.310.37QYLDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkNOBLQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.6% a year−2.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.81−1.37Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.1% to +0.9%−5.5% to +1.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.42−0.93Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%10.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 447 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, KNG and QYLD hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KNG QYLD
Walmart Inc. 1.52% 2.53%
Linde Plc 1.46% 1.03%
PepsiCo, Inc. 1.46% 0.89%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.44% 0.50%
Cintas Corporation 1.45% 0.38%
Fastenal Company 1.43% 0.26%
Roper Technologies, Inc. 1.70% 0.18%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KNG
Pentair plc 1.89%
Erie Indemnity Company 1.58%
The Clorox Company 1.58%
PPG Industries, Inc. 1.57%
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 1.57%
Abbott Laboratories 1.56%
General Dynamics Corporation 1.55%
Lowe's Companies, Inc. 1.55%
Only in QYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.20%
APPLE INC. 7.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.82%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.93%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.62%
ALPHABET INC. 3.50%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy dividend stocks with call overlay covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.0% 12.2%
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.8% 12.3%
Price change, 1 year +11.1% +3.3%
Total return, 1 year +20.8% +16.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +23.9% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −3.1 pts +4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 80% 99%
Age 8.6 years 12.9 years
Net assets, KNG as of Nov 3, 2026 and QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $3.4bn $8.5bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: KNG vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowKNGQYLDKNGQYLDKNGQYLD
3 months+5.2%+2.4%2.0%3.0%−0.5 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+13.5%+5.4%4.3%6.0%−1.4 pts+5.8 pts
1 year+20.8%+16.5%8.8%12.3%−3.1 pts+4.2 pts
3 years+41.8%+52.7%26.9%37.9%−6.7 pts−38.6 pts
Since launchNot the same days: KNG Mar 2018 · QYLD Dec 2013+120.8%+194.8%61.2%117.5%−19.0 pts−610.5 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

KNG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KNG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KNG paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.8%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +23.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KNG or QYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KNG paid 8.8% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.3%, so QYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KNG or QYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, KNG returned +20.8% and QYLD +16.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, KNG or QYLD?
KNG charges 0.74% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KNG against QYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kng-vs-qyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.