Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLD vs RDVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLD paid 12.5% of its price in cash against RDVI’s 8.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
8.8%RDVI cash paid, 1 year
+23.0%QYLD total return, 1 year
+19.2%RDVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLD 82.7RDVI 62.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLD1.2 pts ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLD+23.0%12.5% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLD+23.0%1.2 pts ahead of QQQ
RDVI8 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8.8% of it arrived as cash8 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and RDVI hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QYLD and RDVI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQYLDRDVI
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC5.05%2.18%
NVIDIA CORP8.54%2.16%
MICROSOFT CORP5.84%2.05%
META PLATFORMS INC3.15%2.04%
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.27%1.97%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.75%1.78%
APPLE INC7.82%1.66%
LAM RESEARCH CORP1.58%2.31%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.55%2.30%
KLA CORP1.02%2.16%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.70%0.92%
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC0.55%1.26%
Only in each
Only in QYLDOnly in RDVI
AMAZON.COM INC 4.36%The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.02%The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.22%
TESLA INC 3.05%GE Vernova Inc. 2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.02%The Allstate Corporation 2.14%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.88%Expedia Group, Inc. 2.13%
BROADCOM INC 2.71%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.10%
INTEL CORP 2.51%U.S. Bancorp 2.08%
WALMART INC 2.28%Visa Inc. (Class A) 2.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLD and RDVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLDRDVIQYLDRDVIQYLDRDVI
3 months+3.2%+0.3%3.0%2.1%+5.7 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+14.5%+15.1%6.3%4.6%−9.7 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+23.0%+19.2%12.5%8.8%+1.2 pts−8.0 pts
3 years+55.3%+69.2%36.6%29.6%−42.9 pts+15.5 pts
Since launch+198.3%+101.2%116.0%41.0%−644.6 pts+32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLD and RDVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XFirst Trust
Strategycovered calldividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.8%8.8%
Expense ratio0.60%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%8.8%
Price change, 1 year+9.1%+9.6%
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+19.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+27.2%
Ahead or behind+1.2 pts−8.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age4663 days1429 days
Net assets$8.5bn$3.7bn

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDVI paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or RDVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 8.8%, so QYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or RDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +23.0% and RDVI returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or RDVI?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLD against RDVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against RDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-rdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources