Data as of .
FTQI vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FTQI paid 12.0% of its price in cash against SDVD’s 9.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FTQI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTQI and SDVD hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTQI | SDVD |
|---|---|---|
| US Dollar | 5.75% | 0.88% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. | 0.79% | 0.97% |
| Woodward, Inc. | 0.75% | 0.81% |
| Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (Class A | 0.61% | 0.99% |
| VeriSign, Inc. | 0.57% | 1.00% |
| InterDigital, Inc. | 0.53% | 0.87% |
| SEI Investments Company | 0.28% | 0.55% |
| East West Bancorp, Inc. | 0.26% | 0.94% |
| Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.24% |
| NetApp, Inc. | 0.24% | 0.84% |
| Northern Trust Corporation | 0.24% | 0.55% |
| UMB Financial Corporation | 0.19% | 0.72% |
| Only in FTQI | Only in SDVD |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc. 8.76% | National HealthCare Corporation 1.12% |
| NVIDIA Corporation 6.55% | First BanCorp. 1.04% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5.41% | OFG Bancorp 1.03% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.13% | The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.18% | Interparfums, Inc. 1.00% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.75% | Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00% |
| Tesla, Inc. 2.68% | Assurant, Inc. 0.99% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.54% | Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. 0.95% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTQI | SDVD | FTQI | SDVD | FTQI | SDVD | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | −0.1% | 2.9% | 2.1% | +6.5 pts | −6.7 pts |
| 6 months | +18.3% | +8.3% | 6.3% | 4.4% | −5.9 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +21.5% | +10.8% | 12.0% | 9.2% | −0.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| 3 years | +62.9% | +53.0% | 37.0% | 30.7% | −35.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | +141.7% | +47.6% | 78.8% | 29.7% | −675.0 pts | −4.1 pts |
| FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.9% | 8.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.0% | 9.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | +1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.5% | +10.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 4637 days | 1135 days |
| Net assets | $975m | $888m |
FTQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly.
SDVD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FTQI or SDVD?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting price in cash and SDVD paid 9.2%, so FTQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTQI or SDVD?
- With every distribution reinvested, FTQI returned +21.5% and SDVD returned +10.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FTQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FTQI or SDVD?
- FTQI charges 0.75% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so FTQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTQI against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftqi-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.