Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ANV vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+2.8 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: ANV ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.48 pts
A year: ANV 1.18%, MPDY 0.70%, per filings dated Aug 7, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPDY costs 0.48 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ANV vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureANVMPDY
Paid and earned
Price changefell 7.3% (since Feb 3, 2026)fell 11.2% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNVIDIA (NVDA)not published
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.18%0.70%
Net assets$8.1mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
10.7%
ANV cash paid, since launch, Feb 3, 2026
2.3%
MPDY cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+3.0%
ANV total return, since launch, Feb 3, 2026
−9.1%
MPDY total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
ANV · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
ANV
+3.0%
NVDA
−7.6%

10.6 pts ahead of NVDA

ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

NVDA

−7.6%

ANV

+3.0%

10.7% as cash

10.6 pts ahead of NVDA

Total return, distributions reinvested

10.6 pts ahead of NVDA

ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

NVDA

−7.6%

ANV

+3.0%

10.6 pts ahead of NVDA

10.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPDY · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPDY
−9.1%
none

Not measured

MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPDY

−9.1%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPDY

−9.1%

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPDY since launch: paid 2.3%, price −11.2%, total −9.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF · Autocallable on NVDA, paying monthly MPDY m+ DualYield Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark NVIDIA (NVDA) not set
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 15.2% 13.3%
Expense ratio 1.18% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.7% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026) 2.3% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −7.3% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026) −11.2% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +3.0% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026) −9.1% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −7.6% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind +10.6 pts (since launch, Feb 3, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 5% not published
Age 282 days 92 days
Net assets $8.1m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ANV vs MPDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowANVMPDYANVMPDYANVMPDY
3 months−7.5%−10.3%2.3%2.3%+18.6 ptsnot measured
6 months−4.0%–6.3%–+25.4 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: ANV Feb 2026 · MPDY Aug 2026+3.0%−9.1%10.7%2.3%+10.6 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ANV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ANV

Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ANV paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned −7.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 10.6 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPDY

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPDY paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −9.1%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ANV or MPDY?
ANV charges 1.18% a year and MPDY charges 0.70%, so MPDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ANV against MPDY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mpdy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ANV and MPDY both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ANV and MPDY

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

ANV −7.5%MPDY −10.3%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ANV −7.5%, MPDY −10.3%: ANV +2.8 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.