Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
ANV vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
MPIM costs 0.48 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ANV | MPIM |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 7.3% (since Feb 3, 2026) | fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | NVIDIA (NVDA) | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.18% | 0.70% |
| Net assets | $8.1m | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
NVDA
−7.6%
ANV
+3.0%
10.7% as cash
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
NVDA
−7.6%
ANV
+3.0%
10.6 pts ahead of NVDA
10.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 10.7%, price −7.3%, total +3.0%, NVDA −7.6%, +10.6 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | MPIM | ANV | MPIM | ANV | MPIM |
| 3 months | −7.5% | −10.6% | 2.3% | 3.0% | +18.6 pts | not measured |
| 6 months | −4.0% | – | 6.3% | – | +25.4 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: ANV Feb 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026 | +3.0% | −10.0% | 10.7% | 3.0% | +10.6 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ANV
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ANV paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned −7.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 10.6 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MPIM
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ANV against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mpim
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). ANV against MPIM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mpim
[ANV against MPIM (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mpim)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
ANV and MPIM both write options for income.
ANV and MPIM
Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.
ANV −7.5%, MPIM −10.6%: ANV +3.1 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.