ACSP vs ANV: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and ANV both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | ANV | ACSP | ANV | ACSP | ANV |
| 3 months | not published | +5.3% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts |
| Since launch ACSP Aug 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | −3.9% | +13.2% | 0.0% | 9.5% | −2.4 pts | −13.8 pts |
ACSP and ANV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACSP and ANV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACSP against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-anv
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-anv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACSP against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-anv
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACSP against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-anv
- Markdown
- [ACSP against ANV (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-anv)