Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and OCTJ both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
5.2%OCTJ cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+5.5%OCTJ total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
OCTJ11.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%5.2% as cash11.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%11.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in OCTJ
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%TREASURY BILL 98.69%
TREASURY BILL 1.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and OCTJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPOCTJACSPOCTJACSPOCTJ
3 monthsnot published+1.1%not published1.3%not published−1.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+4.0%not published2.7%not published−14.1 pts
1 yearnot published+5.5%not published5.2%not published−11.1 pts
Since launch−3.8%+18.9%0.0%15.9%−2.1 pts−66.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and OCTJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
OCTJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerProSharesInnovator
Strategyoption incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedquarterly
Payout rate, annualizednot published5.3%
Expense ratio0.72%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)5.2%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−11.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days1082 days
Net assets$27m$15m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

OCTJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or OCTJ?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against OCTJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources