ACSP vs AHD: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and AHD both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF.

0.0%
ACSP cash paid, since launch
10.1%
AHD cash paid, since launch
−3.9%
ACSP total return, since launch
+17.7%
AHD total return, since launch
ACSP · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP
−3.9%
SPY
−1.5%

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

AHD · since launch to Sep 30, 202634 pts behind HOOD
AHD
+17.7%
HOOD
+51.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

10.1% as cash

34 pts behind HOOD

Total return, distributions reinvested

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +51.7%. AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACSPAHDACSPAHDACSPAHD
3 monthsnot published+9.1%not published5.1%not published+5.5 pts
Since launch
ACSP Aug 2026 · AHD May 2026
−3.9%+17.7%0.0%10.1%−2.4 pts−34.0 pts

ACSP and AHD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
AHD
GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF · Autocallable on HOOD, paying monthly
Issuer ProShares GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Robinhood (HOOD)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized not published 32.6%
Expense ratio 0.72% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 10.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −3.9% +6.9%
Total return, 1 year −3.9% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) +17.7% (since launch on May 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.5% +51.7%
Ahead or behind −2.4 pts −34.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 17%
Age 47 days 134 days
Net assets $27m $3m

ACSP and AHD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.

AHD in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, AHD paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned +51.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 34.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 17% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or AHD?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and AHD charges 1.07%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACSP against AHD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-ahd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.