Which paid more, ACQQ or ACRT?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting price in cash and ACRT paid 0.0%, so ACQQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACQQ or ACRT?

With every distribution reinvested, ACQQ returned +1.6% and ACRT −8.7% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or ACRT?

ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and ACRT charges 0.72%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ACQQ vs ACRT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share ACQQ paid 0.0% of its price in cash against ACRT’s 0.0%, and returned more with it reinvested. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.0%

ACQQ cash paid, since launch

0.0%

ACRT cash paid, since launch

+1.6%

ACQQ total return, since launch

−8.7%

ACRT total return, since launch

ACQQ · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with QQQ

ACQQ

+1.6%

QQQ

+1.3%

About even with QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

QQQ

+1.3%

ACQQ

+1.6%

about even with QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

QQQ

+1.3%

ACQQ

+1.6%

about even with QQQ

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

ACRT · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with IWM

ACRT

−8.7%

IWM

−8.7%

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and ACRT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACQQ ACRT

Only in ACQQ

NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%

Only in ACRT

RU2K LADDERED AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACQQ	ACRT	ACQQ	ACRT	ACQQ	ACRT
Since launch ACQQ Aug 2026 · ACRT Aug 2026	+1.6%	−8.7%	0.0%	0.0%	+0.3 pts	0.0 pts

ACQQ and ACRT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACQQ

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ

ACRT

ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM

Issuer ProShares ProShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) Russell 2000 (IWM)

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized not published not published

Expense ratio 0.72% 0.72%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +1.6% −8.7%

Total return, 1 year +1.6% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) −8.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +1.3% −8.7%

Ahead or behind +0.3 pts 0.0 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 47 days 47 days

Net assets $26m $1m

ACQQ and ACRT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

ACRT in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACQQ or ACRT?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting price in cash and ACRT paid 0.0%, so ACQQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACQQ or ACRT?: With every distribution reinvested, ACQQ returned +1.6% and ACRT −8.7% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACQQ or ACRT?: ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and ACRT charges 0.72%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACQQ vs ACSP ACQQ vs APRH ACQQ vs APRJ ACQQ vs BALI ACRT vs IWMW ACRT vs IWMY ACRT vs JANH ACRT vs JANJ

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →Russell 2000 (IWM) →ACQQ on its own →ACRT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACQQ and ACRT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACQQ and ACRT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for ACQQ ↗ProShares page for ACRT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACQQ against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-acrt

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.