ACII vs ACSP: which paid, and which earned it?
ACII and ACSP both write options for income. Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
3.8% as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
about even with SPY
3.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACII and ACSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACII | ACSP | ACII | ACSP | ACII | ACSP |
| 3 months | +1.7% | not published | 2.4% | not published | −0.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch ACII May 2026 · ACSP Aug 2026 | +1.6% | −3.9% | 3.8% | 0.0% | +0.1 pts | −2.4 pts |
ACII and ACSP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACII and ACSP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACII in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 28, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACII paid 3.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACII against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acsp
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACII against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACII against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acsp
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACII against ACSP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acsp
- Markdown
- [ACII against ACSP (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acsp)