ACII vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?
ACII and JULH both write options for income. Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
about even with SPY
3.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
4.8% as cash
11.2 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
11.2 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACII and JULH hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
half
100% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACII | JULH | ACII | JULH | ACII | JULH |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +2.0% | 2.4% | 1.6% | −0.8 pts | −0.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +3.6% | not published | 2.7% | not published | −13.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +4.5% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +21.9% | not published | 18.6% | not published | −63.0 pts |
| Since launch ACII May 2026 · JULH Jul 2023 | +1.6% | +22.9% | 3.8% | 20.3% | +0.1 pts | −55.9 pts |
ACII and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACII and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACII in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 28, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACII paid 3.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly.
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACII against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-julh
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACII against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACII against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-julh
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACII against JULH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-julh
- Markdown
- [ACII against JULH (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-julh)