Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and YLDE both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
7.6%YLDE cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+10.5%YLDE total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
YLDE6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%7.6% of it arrived as cash6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%6 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and YLDE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in YLDE
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.63%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 4.05%
ALPHABET INC 3.60%
NVIDIA CORP 3.03%
NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83%
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and YLDE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPYLDEACSPYLDEACSPYLDE
3 monthsnot published+2.5%not published2.3%not published+0.3 pts
6 monthsnot published+8.4%not published4.1%not published−9.6 pts
1 yearnot published+10.5%not published7.6%not published−6.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+51.1%not published16.8%not published−27.3 pts
Since launch−3.8%+181.4%0.0%42.1%−2.1 pts−86.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and YLDE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
YLDE
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesFranklin
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published7.0%
Expense ratio0.72%0.48%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)7.6%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+10.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−6.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days3405 days
Net assets$27m$170m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

YLDE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or YLDE?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against YLDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources