ACII vs ACRT: which paid, and which earned it?
ACII and ACRT both write options for income. Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
3.8% as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
SPY
+1.6%
ACII
+1.6%
about even with SPY
3.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACII and ACRT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACII | ACRT | ACII | ACRT | ACII | ACRT |
| 3 months | +1.7% | not published | 2.4% | not published | −0.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch ACII May 2026 · ACRT Aug 2026 | +1.6% | −8.7% | 3.8% | 0.0% | +0.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
ACII and ACRT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACII and ACRT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACII in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 28, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACII paid 3.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACII against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acrt
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACII against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acrt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACII against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acrt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACII against ACRT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acrt
- Markdown
- [ACII against ACRT (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-acrt)