ACEI vs JULJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACEI paid 11.1% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.7%, and returned more with it reinvested. Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

11.1%
ACEI cash paid, 1 year
5.7%
JULJ cash paid, 1 year
+5.9%
ACEI total return, 1 year
+5.1%
JULJ total return, 1 year
ACEI · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.8 pts behind SPY
ACEI
+5.9%
SPY
+15.7%

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

11.1% of it arrived as cash

9.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

9.8 pts behind SPY

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

JULJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 202610.6 pts behind SPY
JULJ
+5.1%
SPY
+15.7%

10.6 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULJ

+5.1%

5.7% of it arrived as cash

10.6 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

10.6 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULJ

+5.1%

10.6 pts behind SPY

5.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · JULJ scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
4.0, the lowest in this set97.4, the highest

A percentile among the 175 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACEI and JULJ hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

half

100% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACEI JULJ
TREASURY BILL 100.00% 100.00%
Only in ACEI
Only in JULJ

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACEIJULJACEIJULJACEIJULJ
3 months+5.4%+1.6%3.3%1.4%+2.8 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+5.6%+2.8%6.5%2.7%−11.4 pts−14.2 pts
1 year+5.9%+5.1%11.1%5.7%−9.8 pts−10.6 pts
3 yearsnot published+19.3%not published17.4%not published−65.7 pts
Since launch
ACEI Sep 2025 · JULJ Jul 2023
+6.0%+20.6%11.1%19.0%−11.2 pts−58.2 pts

ACEI and JULJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACEI
Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer Innovator Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 13.0% 5.4%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 11.1% 5.7%
Price change, 1 year −5.7% −0.7%
Total return, 1 year +5.9% +5.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −9.8 pts −10.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 370 days 1185 days
Net assets $50m $14m

ACEI and JULJ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACEI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

JULJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULJ paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACEI or JULJ?
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.7%, so ACEI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACEI or JULJ?
With every distribution reinvested, ACEI returned +5.9% and JULJ +5.1% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACEI or JULJ?
ACEI charges 0.79% a year and JULJ charges 0.79%, so ACEI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACEI against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acei-vs-julj

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.