ACEI vs JANH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACEI paid 11.1% of its price in cash against JANH’s 6.3%, though JANH returned more with it reinvested. Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January.

11.1%
ACEI cash paid, 1 year
6.3%
JANH cash paid, 1 year
+5.9%
ACEI total return, 1 year
+6.5%
JANH total return, 1 year
ACEI · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.8 pts behind SPY
ACEI
+5.9%
SPY
+15.7%

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

11.1% of it arrived as cash

9.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

9.8 pts behind SPY

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

JANH · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.2 pts behind SPY
JANH
+6.5%
SPY
+15.7%

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

6.3% of it arrived as cash

9.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

9.2 pts behind SPY

6.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · JANH scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
4.0, the lowest in this set97.4, the highest

A percentile among the 175 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACEI and JANH hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

half

97% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACEI JANH
TREASURY BILL 100.00% 96.95%
Only in ACEI
Only in JANH
TREASURY BILL 1.53%
TREASURY BILL 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACEIJANHACEIJANHACEIJANH
3 months+5.4%+1.6%3.3%1.6%+2.8 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+5.6%+6.1%6.5%3.2%−11.4 pts−10.9 pts
1 year+5.9%+6.5%11.1%6.3%−9.8 pts−9.2 pts
Since launch
ACEI Sep 2025 · JANH Jan 2024
+6.0%+20.0%11.1%17.7%−11.2 pts−46.6 pts

ACEI and JANH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACEI
Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer Innovator Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 13.0% 6.3%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 11.1% 6.3%
Price change, 1 year −5.7% +0.1%
Total return, 1 year +5.9% +6.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −9.8 pts −9.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 370 days 1002 days
Net assets $50m $12m

ACEI and JANH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACEI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JANH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACEI or JANH?
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and JANH paid 6.3%, so ACEI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACEI or JANH?
With every distribution reinvested, ACEI returned +5.9% and JANH +6.5% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACEI or JANH?
ACEI charges 0.79% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so ACEI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACEI against JANH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acei-vs-janh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.