Which paid more, ACEI or JULH?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so ACEI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACEI or JULH?

With every distribution reinvested, ACEI returned +5.9% and JULH +4.5% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACEI or JULH?

ACEI charges 0.79% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so ACEI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ACEI vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACEI paid 11.1% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, and returned more with it reinvested. Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

11.1%

ACEI cash paid, 1 year

4.8%

JULH cash paid, 1 year

+5.9%

ACEI total return, 1 year

+4.5%

JULH total return, 1 year

ACEI · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI

+5.9%

SPY

+15.7%

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

11.1% of it arrived as cash

9.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

9.8 pts behind SPY

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

JULH · 1 year to Sep 30, 202611.2 pts behind SPY

JULH

+4.5%

SPY

+15.7%

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

4.8% as cash

11.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

11.2 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · JULH scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACEI 34.9

JULH 37.5

4.0, the lowest in this set97.4, the highest

A percentile among the 175 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACEI and JULH hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

50%

half

100% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACEI JULH

TREASURY BILL 100.00% 100.00%

Only in ACEI

Only in JULH

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACEI	JULH	ACEI	JULH	ACEI	JULH
3 months	+5.4%	+2.0%	3.3%	1.6%	+2.8 pts	−0.5 pts
6 months	+5.6%	+3.6%	6.5%	2.7%	−11.4 pts	−13.4 pts
1 year	+5.9%	+4.5%	11.1%	4.8%	−9.8 pts	−11.2 pts
3 years	not published	+21.9%	not published	18.6%	not published	−63.0 pts
Since launch ACEI Sep 2025 · JULH Jul 2023	+6.0%	+22.9%	11.1%	20.3%	−11.2 pts	−55.9 pts

ACEI and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACEI

Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly

JULH

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer Innovator Innovator

Strategy autocallable defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 13.0% 6.6%

Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 11.1% 4.8%

Price change, 1 year −5.7% −0.4%

Total return, 1 year +5.9% +4.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% +15.7%

Ahead or behind −9.8 pts −11.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 370 days 1185 days

Net assets $50m $17m

ACEI and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACEI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACEI or JULH?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so ACEI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACEI or JULH?: With every distribution reinvested, ACEI returned +5.9% and JULH +4.5% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACEI or JULH?: ACEI charges 0.79% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so ACEI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACEI vs JANQ ACEI vs PLA ACEI vs SCA ACEI vs TLA JULH vs CDPI JULH vs CVRD JULH vs DDDD JULH vs DIVO

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACEI on its own →JULH on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACEI and JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACEI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator page for ACEI ↗JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator page for JULH ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACEI against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acei-vs-julh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.