Which is cheaper, ACBH or SALI?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and SALI charges 0.65%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

ACBH vs SALI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+1.4 pts

1 month to Nov 12, 2026: ACBH ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.05 pts

A year: ACBH 0.60%, SALI 0.65%, per filings dated Aug 24, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

ACBH costs 0.05 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACBH vs SALI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	ACBH	SALI
Paid and earned
Measure	ACBH	SALI
Price change	fell 3.5% (since Sep 10, 2026)	fell 4.2% (since Sep 15, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Measure	ACBH	SALI
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	not published
Cost and size
Measure	ACBH	SALI
Expense ratio	0.60%	0.65%
Net assets	$3.6m	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Measure	ACBH	SALI
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Key numbers

2.0%

ACBH cash paid, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

0.8%

SALI cash paid, since launch, Sep 15, 2026

−1.5%

ACBH total return, since launch, Sep 10, 2026

−3.4%

SALI total return, since launch, Sep 15, 2026

ACBH · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH

−1.5%

SPY

+0.2%

1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBH

−1.5%

1.7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.7 pts behind SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+0.2%

ACBH

−1.5%

1.7 pts behind SPY

2.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 2.0%, price −3.5%, total −1.5%, SPY +0.2%, −1.7 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SALI · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured

SALI

−3.4%

none

Not measured

SALI since launch: paid 0.8%, price −4.2%, total −3.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SALI

−3.4%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SALI since launch: paid 0.8%, price −4.2%, total −3.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SALI

−3.4%

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SALI since launch: paid 0.8%, price −4.2%, total −3.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACBH Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY SALI Schroders US Autocallable Ladder Income ETF · Autocallable

Issuer Pacer Schroders

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 14.8% 10.4%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.65%

Cash paid, 1 year 2.0% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) 0.8% (since launch, Sep 15, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −3.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −4.2% (since launch, Sep 15, 2026)

Total return, 1 year −1.5% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) −3.4% (since launch, Sep 15, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.2% (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not published

Ahead or behind −1.7 pts (since launch, Sep 10, 2026) not available

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 63 days 58 days

Net assets $3.6m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACBH vs SALI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	SALI	ACBH	SALI	ACBH	SALI
Since launchNot the same days: ACBH Sep 2026 · SALI Sep 2026	−1.5%	−3.4%	2.0%	0.8%	−1.7 pts	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

ACBH

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 10, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACBH paid 2.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.7 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.8%, paid periodically.

SALI

Over the period from its first trade on Sep 15, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, SALI paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.4%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or SALI?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and SALI charges 0.65%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ACII ACBH vs ACQQ ACBH vs ACRT ACBH vs ACYN SALI vs APRJ SALI vs ACSP SALI vs ACEI SALI vs CAGE

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →ACBH on its own →SALI on its own →ACBH dividend history →SALI dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Pacer website ↗

SALI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SALI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Schroders website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACBH against SALI, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-sali

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACBH and SALI both write options for income.

ACBH on its own →SALI on its own →

Growth of 100

ACBH and SALI

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACBH −5.3%SALI −6.7%

Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACBH −5.3%, SALI −6.7%: ACBH +1.4 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.