Which paid more, ACBE or ACBH?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting price in cash and ACBH paid 0.8%, so ACBH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACBE or ACBH?

With every distribution reinvested, ACBE returned +0.7% and ACBH +1.3% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACBE or ACBH?

ACBE charges 0.60% a year and ACBH charges 0.60%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ACBE vs ACBH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share ACBH paid 0.8% of its price in cash against ACBE’s 0.6%, and returned more with it reinvested. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF.

0.6%

ACBE cash paid, since launch

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

+0.7%

ACBE total return, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

ACBE · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBE

+0.7%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

0.6% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% cash

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBE	ACBH	ACBE	ACBH	ACBE	ACBH
Since launch ACBE Sep 2026 · ACBH Sep 2026	+0.7%	+1.3%	0.6%	0.8%	−0.2 pts	+0.4 pts

ACBE and ACBH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBE

Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer Pacer Pacer

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 10.1%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.60%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.1% +0.4%

Total return, 1 year +0.7% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +0.9%

Ahead or behind −0.2 pts +0.4 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 20 days

Net assets $3m $3m

ACBE and ACBH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACBE or ACBH?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting price in cash and ACBH paid 0.8%, so ACBH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACBE or ACBH?: With every distribution reinvested, ACBE returned +0.7% and ACBH +1.3% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACBE or ACBH?: ACBE charges 0.60% a year and ACBH charges 0.60%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBE vs ACEI ACBE vs ACII ACBE vs ACQQ ACBE vs ACRT ACBH vs ACEI ACBH vs ACII ACBH vs ACQQ ACBH vs ACRT

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBE on its own →ACBH on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBE and ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBE and ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBE against ACBH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acbh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.