Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DQJN vs QJUN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 DQJN can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and QJUN 0.0%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DQJN and QJUNNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $16m for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June and $718m for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June.
DQJN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +21.4%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DQJN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +21.4%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.QJUN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −3.0%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +25.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.90% a year; QJUN is far larger, $718m against $16m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DQJN | QJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +4.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $16m | $718m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DQJN | QJUN | DQJN | QJUN |
| 3 months | −1.0% | −1.9% | +2.5 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 6 months | – | −2.2% | – | −1.7 pts |
| 1 year | – | +4.5% | – | −7.2 pts |
| 3 years | – | +46.5% | – | −41.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DQJN Jun 2026 · QJUN Jun 2021 | −1.9% | +63.9% | +4.4 pts | −37.0 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. QJUN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DQJN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
DQJN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; QJUN runs to Jun 17, 2027, 225 days. DQJN can still gain 22.6% before its cap, QJUN 27.9%. A fall from here reaches DQJN’s buffer after 0.0% and QJUN’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DQJN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 22.6% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 3.4% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QJUN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 27.9% more before it reaches its cap.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DQJN against QJUN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-qjun
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DQJN against QJUN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-qjun
[DQJN against QJUN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-qjun)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.