Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QJL vs QJUN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
QJL can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages as of Nov 3, 2026, and QJUN 0.0% as of Nov 4, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QJL and QJUN
Net assets: $1.1m on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series, and $718m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June.
QJL: reference −5.5% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +23.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
QJL: reference −5.5% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +23.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.QJUN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −3.0%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +25.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QJL costs 0.60 points a year less; QJUN is far larger, $718m against $1.1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | QJL | QJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +4.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.90% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.1m | $718m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | QJL | QJUN | QJL | QJUN |
| 3 months | −0.9% | −1.9% | +2.6 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 6 months | – | −2.2% | – | −1.7 pts |
| 1 year | – | +4.5% | – | −7.2 pts |
| 3 years | – | +46.5% | – | −41.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: QJL Jul 2026 · QJUN Jun 2021 | −0.7% | +63.9% | +2.2 pts | −37.0 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Where each one stands today
QJUN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; QJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches QJL’s buffer after 0.0% and QJUN’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
QJL
Protection left, in index points: 4.5% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QJUN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 27.9% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 3.4% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QJL against QJUN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qjl-vs-qjun
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QJL against QJUN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qjl-vs-qjun
[QJL against QJUN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/qjl-vs-qjun)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.