Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
NJUL vs QJL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
NJUL can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and QJL 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NJUL and QJL
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $269m for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Jul and $1.1m for Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.
NJUL: reference −6.1% since period start, fund −1.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +20.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
NJUL: reference −6.1% since period start, fund −1.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +20.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.QJL: reference −5.5% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +23.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
QJL: reference −5.5% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +23.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.Pair scorecard
QJL costs 0.49 points a year less; NJUL is far larger, $269m against $1.1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | NJUL | QJL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.6% | not published |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $269m | $1.1m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NJUL | QJL | NJUL | QJL |
| 3 months | −1.2% | −0.9% | +2.3 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | −0.8% | – | −0.3 pts | – |
| 1 year | +5.6% | – | −6.1 pts | – |
| 3 years | +46.4% | – | −41.8 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: NJUL Jul 2020 · QJL Jul 2026 | +83.7% | −0.7% | −92.5 pts | +2.2 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Where each one stands today
NJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; QJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches NJUL’s buffer after 0.0% and QJL’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
NJUL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 22.1% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 8.9% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
QJL
Protection left, in index points: 4.5% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NJUL against QJL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/njul-vs-qjl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). NJUL against QJL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/njul-vs-qjl
[NJUL against QJL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/njul-vs-qjl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.