Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DQJN vs NJUL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 DQJN can fall 0.0% before its buffer engages and NJUL 0.0%, and DQJN resets 13 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DQJN and NJULNet assets: $16m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June, and $269m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Jul.
DQJN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +21.4%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DQJN: reference −6.6% since period start, fund −1.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +21.4%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.NJUL: reference −6.1% since period start, fund −1.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +20.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
NJUL: reference −6.1% since period start, fund −1.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +20.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
NJUL costs 0.11 points a year less; NJUL is 16.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DQJN | NJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +5.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | QQQ | QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.79% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $16m | $268m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DQJN | NJUL | DQJN | NJUL |
| 3 months | −1.0% | −1.2% | +2.5 pts | +2.3 pts |
| 6 months | – | −0.8% | – | −0.3 pts |
| 1 year | – | +5.6% | – | −6.1 pts |
| 3 years | – | +46.4% | – | −41.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DQJN Jun 2026 · NJUL Jul 2020 | −1.9% | +83.7% | +4.4 pts | −92.5 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. NJUL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DQJN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DQJN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; NJUL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 238 days. DQJN can still gain 22.6% before its cap, NJUL 22.1%. A fall from here reaches DQJN’s buffer after 0.0% and NJUL’s after 0.0%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DQJN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 22.6% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 3.4% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
NJUL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 22.1% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 8.9% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DQJN against NJUL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-njul
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DQJN against NJUL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-njul
[DQJN against NJUL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-njul)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.