Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DQJN vs PQJL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DQJN can fall 2.6% before its buffer engages and PQJL 1.9%, and DQJN resets 13 days sooner.

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July.

2.6%DQJN can fall this far before its buffer
1.9%PQJL can fall this far before its buffer
18.3%DQJN can still gain
20.8%PQJL can still gain
DQJNBuffer working
10 of 10 pts left+21.4% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+21.4% capTODAY · QQQ 0.0%10 pts+21.4% to cap−10.0% floor0% start+21.4% capTODAY · QQQ 0.0%
PQJLBetween buffer and cap
12 pts of buffer+22.4% more to the cap−12.0% floor0% period start+23.0% capTODAY · QQQ +0.6%12 pts+22.4% to cap−12.0% floor0% start+23.0% capTODAY · QQQ +0.6%

These are two different products. PQJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DQJN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DQJN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 269 days from now; PQJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 282 days. DQJN can still gain 18.3% before its cap, PQJL 20.8%. A fall from here reaches DQJN’s buffer after 2.6% and PQJL’s after 1.9%. Both track QQQ, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DQJN and PQJL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DQJNPQJLDQJNPQJL
3 monthsnot published0.0%not published+2.5 pts
6 monthsnot published+9.7%not published−14.6 pts
1 yearnot published+10.5%not published−11.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DQJN and PQJL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DQJN
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on QQQ and caps the gain at 21.4%, over a period ending Jun 17, 2027
PQJL
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July
Absorbs the first 12% of loss on QQQ and caps the gain at 23.0%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustPGIM
Reference indexQQQQQQ
Buffer10%12%
Outcome periodJun 22, 2026 to Jun 17, 2027Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left269282
Starting cap+21.4%+23.0%
Can still gain18.3%20.8%
Fall before buffer2.6%1.9%
Protection left, index points10.0% of 10.0%12.0% of 12.0%
Index return this period0.0%+0.6%
Fund return this period+1.8%+1.4%
State todayBuffer workingOpen
Expense ratio0.90%0.50%
Net assets$16m$26m

DQJN in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 18.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, QQQ can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 269 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PQJL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 20.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, QQQ can fall 0.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DQJN or PQJL?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DQJN can gain about 18.3% before its cap and PQJL about 20.8%, so PQJL has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DQJN or PQJL?
DQJN ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and PQJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DQJN or PQJL?
DQJN charges 0.90% a year and PQJL charges 0.50%, so PQJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DQJN against PQJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DQJN against PQJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dqjn-vs-pqjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources