Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CTAU vs GJUL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 GJUL can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and CTAU 0.5%, and GJUL resets 18 days sooner.

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series and FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTAU scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

CTAU 99.5GJUL 84.30.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CTAUBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+14.5% more to the cap−30.0% floor0% period start+15.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%30 pts of buffer−30.0% floor0% start+15.0% capTODAY · SPY +0.5%
GJULBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+4.1%+9.7% to cap−15.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%

Where each one stands today

GJUL resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 298 days from now; CTAU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 316 days. A fall from here reaches CTAU’s buffer after 0.5% and GJUL’s after 3.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

CTAU and GJUL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
CTAUGJULCTAUGJUL
3 monthsnot published+2.5%not published+0.2 pts
6 monthsnot published+9.3%not published−8.7 pts
1 yearnot published+10.0%not published−6.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+45.5%not published−32.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CTAU and GJUL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTAU
Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series
Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.0%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
GJUL
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jul 16, 2027
IssuerCorgiFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer30%15%
Outcome periodAug 1, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027Jul 20, 2026 to Jul 16, 2027
Days left316298
Starting cap+15.0%+13.8%
Can still gainnot published10.2%
Fall before buffer0.5%3.3%
Protection left, index points30.0% of 30.0%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+0.5%+4.1%
Fund return this period+0.8%+2.5%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.85%
Net assets$1m$414m

CTAU in plain words

The fund's price can fall 0.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 316 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

GJUL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 298 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CTAU or GJUL?
CTAU ends its outcome period on Jul 31, 2027 and GJUL on Jul 16, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CTAU or GJUL?
CTAU charges 0.30% a year and GJUL charges 0.85%, so CTAU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTAU against GJUL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTAU against GJUL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctau-vs-gjul Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources