Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CTAU vs DDFG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
DDFG can fall 2.7% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CTAU 0.0% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CTAU and DDFG
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $1.1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series and $92m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Aug.
CTAU: reference −0.4% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +15.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CTAU: reference −0.4% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +15.0%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 3, 2026.DDFG: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.4%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DDFG: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.4%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CTAU costs 0.49 points a year less; DDFG is far larger, $92m against $1.1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CTAU | DDFG |
|---|---|---|
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.5% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $1.1m | $92m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTAU | DDFG | CTAU | DDFG |
| 3 months | +0.3% | +1.1% | +0.7 pts | +1.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CTAU Aug 2026 · DDFG Aug 2026 | +0.4% | +1.8% | +0.9 pts | +0.6 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. DDFG is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CTAU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DDFG resets first, on Jul 31, 2027, 269 days from now; CTAU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 270 days. A fall from here reaches CTAU’s buffer after 0.0% and DDFG’s after 2.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CTAU
Protection left, in index points: 29.6% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 270 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
DDFG
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 8.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 269 days remained on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CTAU against DDFG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctau-vs-ddfg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CTAU against DDFG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctau-vs-ddfg
[CTAU against DDFG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctau-vs-ddfg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.