Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

GJUL vs PAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 GJUL can fall 3.4% before its buffer engages and PAUG 2.4%, and GJUL resets 15 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GJUL and PAUG

Net assets: $408m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July, and $1.0bn on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Aug.

At a glance
3.4%
GJUL can fall this far before its buffer
2.4%
PAUG can fall this far before its buffer
10.1%
GJUL can still gain
11.1%
PAUG can still gain
GJUL Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capGJUL: reference +3.1% since period start, fund +2.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+3.1%+10.7% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.1%Between buffer and capGJUL: reference +3.1% since period start, fund +2.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+13.8% cap+3.1% gain captured+10.7% more to the capTODAY · SPY +3.1%

GJUL: reference +3.1% since period start, fund +2.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

GJUL: reference +3.1% since period start, fund +2.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PAUG Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capPAUG: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer+2.6%+11.2% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +2.6%Between buffer and capPAUG: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+13.8% cap+2.6% gain captured+11.2% more to the capTODAY · SPY +2.6%

PAUG: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.2%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +13.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PAUG costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; PAUG is 2.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GJUL vs PAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGJULPAUG
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.2%+10.1%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer3.1%2.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$408m$1.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · GJUL and PAUG score the same If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score83.2GJUL83.2PAUG

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 169 weekly returns · each against SPY
GJUL PAUG
Return
Total return edge PAUG (slight) +45.1% +46.6%
Annualized edge PAUG (slight) +12.1% +12.5%
Price return edge PAUG (slight) +45.1% +46.6%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 7.3% 7.3%
Max drawdown edge Tie −9.4% −9.3%
Downside capture 51.0% 50.0%
Beta 0.50 0.50
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PAUG (slight) 0.98 1.03
Sortino edge PAUG (slight) 1.53 1.57
Treynor 0.144 0.151
Calmar edge PAUG (slight) 1.29 1.34
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.3% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.24 0.55
Information ratio −0.91 −0.87
Tracking error 7.3% 7.3%
Reading

From Aug 2023 to Oct 2026, PAUG returned slightly more: +46.6% to +45.1%. GJUL and PAUG swung about the same: 7.3% and 7.3%. GJUL and PAUG fell about the same at their worst: −9.4% and −9.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GJUL vs PAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureGJULPAUGSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+45.1%+46.6%PAUG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+12.1%+12.5%PAUG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+45.1%+46.6%PAUG (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility7.3%7.3%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.7%4.8%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−9.4%−9.3%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture40.8%40.9%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture51.0%50.0%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.500.501.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.931.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.981.03PAUG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.531.57PAUG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1440.1510.139PAUG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.291.34PAUG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.3% a year+0.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.240.55Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.0% to +2.5%−1.5% to +2.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.91−0.87PAUG (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.3%7.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 169 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: GJUL vs PAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowGJULPAUGGJULPAUG
3 months+0.7%+0.7%+1.1 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+4.6%+4.5%+0.1 pts0.0 pts
1 year+10.2%+10.1%−3.4 pts−3.5 pts
3 years+47.9%+49.7%−28.5 pts−26.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: GJUL Jul 2023 · PAUG Aug 2019+45.0%+90.1%−23.8 pts−69.9 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GJUL FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jul 16, 2027 PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Aug · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 15% 15%
Outcome period Jul 20, 2026 to Jul 16, 2027 Jul 31, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027
Days left 254 269
Starting cap +13.8% +13.8%
Can still gain 10.1% 11.1%
Fall before buffer 3.4% 2.4%
Protection left, index points 15.0% of 15.0% 15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period +3.1% +2.6%
Fund return this period +2.6% +2.2%
State today Open Open
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.79%
Net assets, GJUL as of Nov 3, 2026 and PAUG as of Nov 4, 2026 $408m $1.0bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

GJUL resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 254 days from now; PAUG runs to Jul 31, 2027, 269 days. GJUL can still gain 10.1% before its cap, PAUG 11.1%. A fall from here reaches GJUL’s buffer after 3.4% and PAUG’s after 2.4%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GJUL and PAUG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GJUL

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 254 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PAUG

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 269 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, GJUL or PAUG?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, GJUL can gain about 10.1% before its cap and PAUG about 11.1%, so PAUG has more room left this period.
Which resets first, GJUL or PAUG?
GJUL ends its outcome period on Jul 16, 2027 and PAUG on Jul 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GJUL or PAUG?
GJUL charges 0.85% a year and PAUG charges 0.79%, so PAUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GJUL against PAUG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gjul-vs-paug

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.