Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GJUL vs ZAUG: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 GJUL can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and ZAUG 1.0%, and GJUL resets 15 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August.

3.3%GJUL can fall this far before its buffer
1.0%ZAUG can fall this far before its buffer
10.2%GJUL can still gain
7.3%ZAUG can still gain
GJULBetween buffer and cap
15 pts−15.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%−15.0% floor0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +4.1%
ZAUGFull floor
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+8.4% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+8.4% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. ZAUG is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. GJUL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

GJUL resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 298 days from now; ZAUG runs to Jul 31, 2027, 313 days. GJUL can still gain 10.2% before its cap, ZAUG 7.3%. A fall from here reaches GJUL’s buffer after 3.3% and ZAUG’s after 1.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

GJUL and ZAUG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
GJULZAUGGJULZAUG
3 months+2.5%+1.4%+0.2 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+9.3%+4.7%−8.7 pts−13.4 pts
1 year+10.0%+5.6%−6.5 pts−10.9 pts
3 years+45.5%not published−32.9 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GJUL and ZAUG on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GJUL
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - July
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jul 16, 2027
ZAUG
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 8.4%, over a period ending Jul 31, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%100%
Outcome periodJul 20, 2026 to Jul 16, 2027Jul 31, 2026 to Jul 31, 2027
Days left298313
Starting cap+13.8%+8.4%
Can still gain10.2%7.3%
Fall before buffer3.3%1.0%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+4.1%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.5%+0.9%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets$414m$163m

GJUL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 298 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

ZAUG in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 313 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, GJUL or ZAUG?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, GJUL can gain about 10.2% before its cap and ZAUG about 7.3%, so GJUL has more room left this period.
Which resets first, GJUL or ZAUG?
GJUL ends its outcome period on Jul 16, 2027 and ZAUG on Jul 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, GJUL or ZAUG?
GJUL charges 0.85% a year and ZAUG charges 0.79%, so ZAUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GJUL against ZAUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GJUL against ZAUG, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gjul-vs-zaug Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources