BAUG vs CTAU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 BAUG can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and CTAU 2.6%. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $274m for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Aug and $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series.
CTAU costs 0.49 points a year less; BAUG is far larger, $274m against $1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| BAUG | CTAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $274m | $1m |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | not published |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.0% | 2.6% |
BAUG: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +17.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
BAUG: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +17.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CTAU: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CTAU: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
A percentile among the 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Where each one stands today
BAUG resets first, on Jul 31, 2027, 291 days from now; CTAU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 291 days. A fall from here reaches BAUG’s buffer after 3.3% and CTAU’s after 2.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAUG | CTAU | BAUG | CTAU |
| 3 months | +3.8% | not published | +0.3 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +9.5% | not published | −2.5 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +14.8% | not published | −2.5 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +68.4% | not published | −11.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch Not the same days: BAUG Aug 2019 · CTAU Aug 2026 | +124.2% | +1.1% | −39.7 pts | +0.2 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BAUG
From its price on Oct 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 13.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 291 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About CTAU
The fund's price can fall 2.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAUG against CTAU, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-ctau
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). BAUG against CTAU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-ctau
[BAUG against CTAU (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-ctau)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.