BAUG vs PMAU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 BAUG can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and PMAU 1.7%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $275m for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Aug and $7m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August.
PMAU costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; BAUG is far larger, $275m against $7m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| BAUG | PMAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $275m | $7m |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.0% | +6.3% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.0% | |
BAUG: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +17.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
BAUG: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +3.3%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +17.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
PMAU: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +1.3%; buffer Floor; cap +7.9%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. PMAU is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. BAUG is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
BAUG resets first, on Jul 31, 2027, 295 days from now; PMAU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 295 days. BAUG can still gain 13.9% before its cap, PMAU 6.1%. A fall from here reaches BAUG’s buffer after 3.3% and PMAU’s after 1.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAUG | PMAU | BAUG | PMAU |
| 3 months | +3.8% | +1.5% | +0.6 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +11.0% | +4.2% | −3.6 pts | −10.4 pts |
| 1 year | +14.0% | +6.3% | −2.0 pts | −9.7 pts |
| 3 years | +67.4% | not published | −11.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch Not the same days: BAUG Aug 2019 · PMAU Aug 2025 | +124.1% | +8.3% | −40.0 pts | −16.9 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BAUG
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 13.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 295 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About PMAU
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAUG against PMAU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-pmau
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BAUG against PMAU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-pmau
[BAUG against PMAU (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/baug-vs-pmau)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.