Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
URA vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, URA returned −30.3% to VGT's +24.7%, and VGT charges 0.09% to URA's 0.69%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about URA and VGT
Net assets: $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGT costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 55.0 points.
| Measure | URA | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.3% | +24.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011 | |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nuclear and uranium | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50 |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 43.7 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, URA as of Oct 12, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $5.4bn | $154.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 63% | 63.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, URA and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
URA and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URA
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
VGT
VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are URA and VGT in the same category?
- URA is a thematic ETF and VGT is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, URA or VGT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, URA returned −30.3% and VGT +24.7%.
- Which is cheaper, URA or VGT?
- VGT is cheaper, by 0.60 percentage points a year. That is about $60 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, URA against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ura-vs-vgt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). URA against VGT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ura-vs-vgt
[URA against VGT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ura-vs-vgt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.