Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TECY vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

TECY and XLK are measured over different days, and XLK charges 0.08% to TECY's 1.07%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TECY and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $398,409 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−0.6%
TECY total return, since launch, May 5, 2026
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
1.07%
TECY expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.99 points a year less.

TECY vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTECYXLK
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+27.1%
Cash paid, share of starting value, since May 5, 202620.1%
Price change, since May 5, 2026fell 20.6%
Latest payout, annualized39.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate95% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its high5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBenchmark: Technology sector, measured through XLKTechnology Select Sector Index
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 16.2 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.07%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$398,409$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 15, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 23 weekly returns
TECY XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK −3.4% +4.2%
Price return edge XLK −21.4% +4.0%
Risk
Max drawdown edge TECY −6.3% −8.3%
Reading

XLK returned more: +4.2% to −3.4%. TECY fell less at its worst: −6.3% to −8.3%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: TECY vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTECYXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−3.4%+4.2%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return−21.4%+4.0%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown−6.3%−8.3%TECYDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 23 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TECY and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TECY XLK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TECY
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Income ETF Stock ETF
What it is synthetic covered call, vs XLK Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year −0.6% (since launch, May 5, 2026) +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.6% (XLK) (since launch, May 5, 2026) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −16.2 pts vs XLK (since launch, May 5, 2026) +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.08%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $398,409 $125.0bn

TECY and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for TECY; the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TECY

Over the period from its first trade on May 5, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026, TECY paid 20.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +15.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.8%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are TECY and XLK in the same category?
TECY is an option-income ETF and XLK is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, TECY or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.99 percentage points a year. That is about $99 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TECY against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tecy-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.