Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VHT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VHT returned +25.0% to XLK's +27.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VHT and XLK

Net assets: $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.09%
VHT expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; XLK is 6.7 times larger.

VHT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVHTXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50Technology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$19.1bn$127.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
VHT XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +797.6% +2,212.1%
Annualized edge XLK +10.1% +14.8%
Price return edge XLK +552.3% +1,626.1%
Risk
Volatility edge VHT 16.4% 20.4%
Max drawdown edge VHT −38.1% −50.7%
Downside capture 100.2% 113.0%
Beta 1.01 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.56 0.69
Sortino edge XLK 0.79 1.02
Treynor 0.103 0.094
Calmar edge XLK (slight) 0.27 0.29
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.17 0.67
Information ratio 0.15 0.22
Tracking error 0.8% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: VHT against FHLC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +2,212.1% to +797.6%. VHT swung less: 16.4% to 20.4%. VHT fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −50.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VHT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVHTXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+797.6%+2,212.1%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+14.8%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+552.3%+1,626.1%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.4%20.4%VHTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%13.8%VHTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−38.1%−50.7%VHTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.7%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.2%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.011.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.560.69XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.791.02XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1030.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.270.29XLK (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkFHLCSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.170.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.5%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.150.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VHT and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VHT XLK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Health Care Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +25.4% (FHLC) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −0.4 pts vs FHLC +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 85.5% 99.9%
Holdings 414 76
Net assets, VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.1bn $125.0bn

VHT and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FB0405DADF

VHT and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. VHT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50 and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VHT returned +25.0% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VHT or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VHT returned +25.0% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, VHT or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VHT and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of VHT and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VHT against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vht-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.