Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
TYLG vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TYLG returned +26.1% to XLK's +27.1%, and XLK charges 0.08% to TYLG's 0.60%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about TYLG and XLK
Net assets: $17m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; XLK is far larger, $129.4bn against $17m.
| Measure | TYLG | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +26.1% | +27.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 14.4% | rose 26.5% |
| Latest payout, annualized | 11.2% | |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $17m | $129.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 47% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, TYLG and XLK hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
47% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
TYLG and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price.
TYLG
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TYLG paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.1%. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are TYLG and XLK in the same category?
- TYLG is an option-income ETF and XLK is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, TYLG or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TYLG returned +26.1% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, TYLG or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, TYLG against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tylg-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). TYLG against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tylg-vs-xlk
[TYLG against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tylg-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.