Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SPSM vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, SPSM returned +17.6% to VTWO's +14.3%; 46% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SPSM and VTWO

Net assets: $16.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+17.6%
SPSM total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.03%
SPSM expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPSM costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; VTWO is 1.1 times larger.

SPSM vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPSMVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high6.7%, high on Aug 14, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$15.7bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common46%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.3%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 692 weekly returns
SPSM VTWO
Return
Total return edge SPSM (slight) +222.7% +217.3%
Annualized edge Tie +9.2% +9.1%
Price return edge VTWO (slight) +158.2% +166.6%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.2% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge VTWO (slight) −41.9% −40.2%
Downside capture 100.3% 99.5%
Beta 1.00 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.43 0.43
Sortino edge Tie 0.63 0.62
Treynor 0.091 0.108
Calmar edge VTWO (slight) 0.22 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.73 0.46
Information ratio −0.20 0.02
Tracking error 2.4% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: SPSM against IJR, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPSM returned slightly more: +222.7% to +217.3%. SPSM and VTWO swung about the same: 21.2% and 21.2%. VTWO fell slightly less at its worst: −40.2% to −41.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SPSM vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSPSMVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+222.7%+217.3%SPSM (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+9.1%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+158.2%+166.6%VTWO (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.2%21.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.6%14.6%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−41.9%−40.2%VTWO (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.1%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.3%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.991.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.430.43TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.630.62TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0910.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.23VTWO (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIJRIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.730.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.8% to +0.8%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.200.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 692 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

46%

By the books each fund has filed, SPSM and VTWO hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

46% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SPSM VTWO
GLAUKOS CORP 0.61% 0.31%
VIASAT INC 0.56% 0.30%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS INC 0.52% 0.28%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC A 0.48% 0.28%
SM ENERGY CO 0.53% 0.27%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES 0.52% 0.27%
TG THERAPEUTICS INC 0.46% 0.27%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.36% 0.26%
PLEXUS CORP 0.35% 0.23%
STONEX GROUP INC 0.35% 0.23%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.35% 0.23%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS C 0.41% 0.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SPSM
PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC 0.58%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.46%
RALLIANT CORP 0.44%
CARMAX INC 0.44%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO 0.43%
ETSY INC 0.43%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC 0.42%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Cytokinetics Inc 0.29%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +17.6% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.5% (IJR) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs IJR +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 609 2002
Net assets, SPSM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.0bn $16.6bn

SPSM and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BBD336953D

SPSM and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. SPSM follows S&P SmallCap 600 Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 46% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 SPSM returned +17.6% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SPSM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SPSM

SPSM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 609 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPSM or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPSM returned +17.6% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, SPSM or VTWO?
SPSM is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPSM and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SPSM and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SPSM against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spsm-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.