Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to VTWO's +14.3%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWC and VTWO

Net assets: $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+16.5%
IWC total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.60%
IWC expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; VTWO is 11.9 times larger.

IWC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWCVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high9.5%, high on Aug 14, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell Microcap IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.4bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common13%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
IWC VTWO
Return
Total return edge Tie +406.6% +409.2%
Annualized edge Tie +10.6% +10.6%
Price return edge Tie +317.3% +315.9%
Risk
Volatility edge VTWO (slight) 22.4% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge VTWO −45.2% −40.2%
Downside capture 111.7% 99.5%
Beta 1.16 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VTWO (slight) 0.49 0.51
Sortino edge VTWO (slight) 0.71 0.74
Treynor 0.070 0.108
Calmar edge VTWO 0.23 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha −3.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.41 0.46
Information ratio −0.16 0.02
Tracking error 12.0% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: IWC against IWV, Aug 26, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWC and VTWO returned about the same: +406.6% and +409.2%. VTWO swung slightly less: 21.0% to 22.4%. VTWO fell less at its worst: −40.2% to −45.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWCVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+406.6%+409.2%TiePrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.6%+10.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+317.3%+315.9%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.4%21.0%VTWO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.4%14.5%VTWO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−45.2%−40.2%VTWODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture118.0%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.7%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.160.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.490.51VTWO (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.710.74VTWO (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0700.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.26VTWOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−3.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.410.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.5% to +1.4%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.160.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, IWC and VTWO hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWC VTWO
CAREDX 0.88% 0.11%
PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.73% 0.09%
OUSTER 0.53% 0.09%
SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60% 0.08%
HYPERLIQUID STRATEGIES INC 0.46% 0.08%
NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.63% 0.07%
STRIVE INC CLASS A 0.50% 0.07%
INNODATA 0.35% 0.07%
VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.59% 0.07%
INTERFACE 0.52% 0.07%
BUTTERFLY NETWORK CLASS A 0.40% 0.07%
MBX BIOSCIENCES 0.40% 0.06%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWC
QUANTUM CORPORATION 0.15%
AVITA MEDICAL INC 0.12%
FAETH THERAPEUTICS INC 0.11%
FATE THERAPEUTICS INC 0.06%
AMERICAN OUTDOOR BRANDS INC 0.05%
AMERICAN WELL CLASS A 0.05%
BNB STANDARD CORP 0.05%
NN INC 0.05%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell Microcap Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +3.2 pts vs IWV +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 0.5%
Holdings 1365 2002
Net assets, IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.2bn $16.6bn

IWC and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AB91FC951D

IWC and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWC follows Russell Microcap Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 13% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWC returned +16.5% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWC or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWC or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWC and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWC and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWC against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.