Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NUSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NUSC returned +12.2% to VTWO's +14.3%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NUSC and VTWO

Net assets: $1.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+12.2%
NUSC total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.31%
NUSC expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points.

NUSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNUSCVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.2%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Aug 14, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNuveen ESG USA Small-Cap IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.31%0.06%
Net assets, NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$1.3bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund10.2%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 513 weekly returns
NUSC VTWO
Return
Total return edge NUSC (slight) +139.1% +131.9%
Annualized edge NUSC (slight) +9.2% +8.9%
Price return edge VTWO (slight) +100.1% +104.3%
Risk
Volatility edge NUSC (slight) 21.6% 22.6%
Max drawdown edge Tie −40.5% −40.2%
Downside capture 103.0% 99.5%
Beta 1.07 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge NUSC (slight) 0.40 0.38
Sortino edge NUSC (slight) 0.57 0.54
Treynor 0.081 0.108
Calmar edge NUSC (slight) 0.23 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.5% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.33 0.46
Information ratio −0.34 0.02
Tracking error 10.5% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: NUSC against MLRG, Dec 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

NUSC returned slightly more: +139.1% to +131.9%. NUSC swung slightly less: 21.6% to 22.6%. NUSC and VTWO fell about the same at their worst: −40.5% and −40.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: NUSC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNUSCVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+139.1%+131.9%NUSC (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.2%+8.9%NUSC (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+100.1%+104.3%VTWO (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.6%22.6%NUSC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.1%15.8%NUSC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.5%−40.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.6%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture103.0%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.070.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.771.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.400.38NUSC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.570.54NUSC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.22NUSC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.5% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.330.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−11.0% to +2.1%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.340.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.5%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 513 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

22%

By the books each fund has filed, NUSC and VTWO hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

22% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first NUSC VTWO
Moog Inc 0.62% 0.36%
JFrog Ltd 0.40% 0.35%
Glaukos Corp 0.47% 0.31%
Cytokinetics Inc 0.64% 0.29%
Old National Bancorp 0.47% 0.28%
Jackson Financial Inc 0.58% 0.28%
InterDigital Inc 0.59% 0.28%
Brinker International Inc 0.32% 0.28%
Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc 0.60% 0.27%
HealthEquity Inc 0.48% 0.24%
Silicon Laboratories Inc 0.54% 0.24%
Plexus Corp 0.50% 0.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in NUSC
ATI Inc 1.26%
TD SYNNEX Corp 1.08%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.07%
Viatris Inc 1.07%
nVent Electric PLC 1.06%
East West Bancorp Inc 1.04%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 0.96%
AGNC Investment Corp 0.90%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
Viasat Inc 0.30%
Hut 8 Corp 0.29%
CareTrust REIT Inc 0.29%
Krystal Biotech Inc 0.29%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +12.2% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark −1.4 pts vs MLRG +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.31% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 6.1% 0.5%
Holdings 405 2002
Net assets, NUSC as of Jul 31, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.3bn $16.6bn

NUSC and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BF52AEE917

NUSC and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. NUSC follows Nuveen ESG USA Small-Cap Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 NUSC returned +12.2% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NUSC

NUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 6% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NUSC or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NUSC returned +12.2% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, NUSC or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NUSC and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 6% of NUSC and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NUSC against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nusc-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.