Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FYC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FYC returned +21.7% to VTWO's +14.3%; 17% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FYC and VTWO

Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+21.7%
FYC total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.70%
FYC expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.64 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points.

FYC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYCVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.7%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high8.6%, high on Jun 30, 20267.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.06%
Net assets, FYC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$1.3bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common17%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund7.7%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 29, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 808 weekly returns
FYC VTWO
Return
Total return edge FYC +452.2% +297.6%
Annualized edge FYC +11.6% +9.3%
Price return edge FYC +430.8% +226.0%
Risk
Volatility edge VTWO (slight) 22.1% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge VTWO −46.4% −40.2%
Downside capture 112.5% 99.5%
Beta 1.19 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FYC 0.53 0.45
Sortino edge FYC 0.78 0.65
Treynor 0.100 0.108
Calmar edge FYC (slight) 0.25 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.92 0.46
Information ratio −0.02 0.02
Tracking error 10.8% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FYC against IWV, Apr 29, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FYC returned more: +452.2% to +297.6%. VTWO swung slightly less: 21.2% to 22.1%. VTWO fell less at its worst: −40.2% to −46.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FYC vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFYCVTWOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+452.2%+297.6%FYCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.6%+9.3%FYCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+430.8%+226.0%FYCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.1%21.2%VTWO (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.2%14.7%VTWO (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−46.4%−40.2%VTWODeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture122.2%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture112.5%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.190.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.781.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.530.45FYCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.780.65FYCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1000.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.23FYC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.920.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−7.6% to +2.7%−0.4% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.020.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.8%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 808 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

17%

By the books each fund has filed, FYC and VTWO hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

17% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FYC VTWO
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. 0.62% 0.19%
GRAIL, Inc. 0.55% 0.19%
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation 0.61% 0.15%
BGC Group Inc. (Class A) 0.63% 0.14%
Delek US Holdings, Inc. 0.62% 0.14%
Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0.49% 0.14%
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. 0.22% 0.14%
AZZ Inc. 0.26% 0.13%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (Class A) 0.34% 0.13%
Tenable Holdings, Inc. 0.68% 0.13%
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 0.54% 0.13%
Fastly, Inc. (Class A) 0.54% 0.13%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FYC
Netskope, Inc. (Class A) 0.76%
EZCORP, Inc. 0.50%
Trulieve Cannabis Corp. 0.50%
Uranium Royalty Corp. 0.46%
Hagerty, Inc. (Class A) 0.43%
Freshpet, Inc. 0.42%
Warner Music Group Corp. (Class A) 0.41%
YETI Holdings, Inc. 0.38%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +21.7% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (IWV) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +8.4 pts vs IWV +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.5%
Holdings 264 2002
Net assets, FYC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.3bn $16.6bn

FYC and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F4A4D42EE2

FYC and VTWO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FYC follows Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 17% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FYC returned +21.7% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FYC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FYC

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.

FYC tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.70% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 264 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 8.6% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FYC or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FYC returned +21.7% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, FYC or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.64 percentage points a year. That is about $64 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FYC and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FYC and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FYC against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fyc-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.